Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Its Bohn?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Its Bohn?

    BOULDER ? Speculation and rumors thrive on trying to "put two and two together," so it comes as no surprise that some wonder whether Colorado athletic director Mike Bohn will interview with Kansas this weekend while in Lawrence, Kan., for Saturday's football game between the Buffaloes and KU, his alma mater.
    That certainly would be convenient. However, Bohn said Wednesday that he has not been contacted by Kansas and is unaware of any timetable the school might have for hiring an athletic director. The position was vacated when Lew Perkins resigned on Sept. 8 amid allegations of a ticket scandal involving athletic department employees.
    Saying he is happy at Colorado and looks forward to CU's move to the future Pac-12 next year, Bohn did not want to be quoted about the KU opening because anything he says could lead to further speculation.
    Nobody could blame him for picking up the phone if the caller ID displayed a Lawrence number. Bohn, who turns 50 on Nov. 16, earns a base salary of $300,000 annually, with another $100,000 possible from incentives. Perkins' yearly compensation was $900,000.
    A multisport standout at Boulder High School, including the starting center on the Panthers' 1979 state championship basketball team, Bohn played football and baseball for the Jayhawks in the early 1980s. He became CU's athletic director on April 13, 2005.
    Kansas officials have said the hiring process could last until early spring, although many expect a decision to be reached sooner. KU has not mentioned potential candidates for the opening.
    Let me make the first to make a Bohn(er) joke.

  • #2
    Re: Its Bohn?

    NOOOOOOOOOOO. :runaway:

    I'd hope that the next AD would have some FBS experience.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Its Bohn?

      All's quiet on the AD chatter. Ready for the 'duh' moment of the year? The Stanford AD says he's not interested.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Its Bohn?

        Given how fucked the CU athletic department is right now, you'd have to think that KU would probably wanna look elsewhere.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Its Bohn?

          I really don't see how this isn't a bigger story. There really hasn't been anyone investigating anything except the Bohn angle for the last 3-4 weeks. Even those articles are few and far between (and mainly are covered by the ... sigh ... UDK).

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Its Bohn?

            JK keeps saying the committee's doing a great job, some great candidates are interested, blah, blah blah.

            I think he's got those posters convinced its going to be a Deloss Dodds-type hire. I can't wait to see what happens when it's someone much lower on the athletics totem pole.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Its Bohn?

              This drives me nuts. The more powerful totems are often located at the base of said pole bc they support the higher figures. Lower on the pole is good as it implies strength and stability.

              It's not always true, but a simplistic hierarchy is certainly a western interpretation, most cultures did not associate meaning to order, but often the lower were often as more impt than those above.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Its Bohn?

                [quote author=vorsk link=topic=1947.msg22836#msg22836 date=1289273153]
                This drives me nuts. The more powerful totems are often located at the base of said pole bc they support the higher figures. Lower on the pole is good as it implies strength and stability.

                It's not always true, but a simplistic hierarchy is certainly a western interpretation, most cultures did not associate meaning to order, but often the lower were often as more impt than those above.
                [/quote]

                Comment

                Working...
                X